SWDTeam Forums

Welcome to the SWDTeam forums. Enjoy your stay!, Thank you for being part of our community!

[DMU Ban appeal] Shadowpeter03: " Greifing " [Perm]

Minecraft username:

Shadowpeter03

Why you were banned:

" Greifing "

Ban duration: 

' Until appeal '

What were you doing last on the server:

Walking around in the wilderness.

 

Why you think you should be pardoned early (Please keep this factual. We understand you are sorry that you got banned so please stick with the facts):

 

Firstly i'd like to make it known that i disliked war major as one of the first things he did was call me by my first name which is contained within my Minecraft username which i'd expressed disintrest in from the first time he said this and he would threaten me over things that i would not consider ' the rules '

I.E

 

Me : " you watch dubbed? "
War_Major ; " Don't " ( para prasing as i don't remember what he said exactly. )

Secondly the reason i believe i was banned was for 2 accounts of greifing which i don't deny. However these occured close to the DMU Public spawn in which a lot of the area has been dug up or has stuff put over it, so when i placed the signs down upon someone else's i was under the assumption they'd already abandoned the area and moved on.

 

In addition i would also like to tack on that depite the fact he stated numberous times admins are not to interfere in player arguements War_Major got inbetween me and another user who was making an unoffical " cult of skaro " at the time punishing me for going near the base in which i helped create which shows a clear bias towards me as this shows he went out of his way to get envolved in something he normally wouldn't have simply because me the indivisual was envolved as within all my time on the DMU i have never seen any admin nor himself do this for anyone else.

 

Thirdly this ban happened after i posted a ' mute appeal ' as war_major at this time had muted me so i couldn't speak to anyone and told me that if i were to be un muted i'd have to post an appeal on the site. the fact this happened very shortly after is very suspcious. Not to mention that whilst im claimed to have ' greified ' i was never confronted over it in game and as such i believe there is a lack of evidence to show this.

 

My belief is that war_major perm muted me and convinced me to do a ' mute appeal ' so it would look like i was trying to rebel against the DMU staff and covered it up with ' greifing ' as to not raise any eyebrows , this story wouldn't be hard to pass off as i was a very naughty kid on the DMU.

 

P.S ~ i would appricate if you handled this appeal professionally in which i mean no insults are to be thrown in any which dirrection in any shape or form and there will be no attitudes from either side towards any persons.

 

 

Firstly i would like to express my opinon that i don't think site matters and incidents should be used as a reason over in game bans as it shows bias and looks very un professional.

 

Secondly as the sign states ' i thought this was open for public use ' , this shows that not only was i sorry for doing it but that it was an accident as since there was nothing preventing me from breaking the structure i thought i was allowed to tunnel through it due to the fact it was in the middle of the nether in a public portal in a place where block permissions prevented me from breaking something and i don't think the ban is justified due to this.

 

As for " breaking into jail " , this was done once after being jailed as i was curious as to weather or not i could use the tardis by bypass boundry restrictions which might i add breaks NO rule at the time of comitting this " crime " there was no rule against using the tardis to bypass block restrictions and i have no memory of being confronted over being jailed for bad langauge which might i add i doubt was possible as there is a filter in place to cease anyone from ever using bad langauge.

 

And as there is a filter to stop swearing in the first place being jailed or punished for being filtered might as well be considered ' admin abuse ' if not a waste of time as the point of a filter is to stop swearing so admins don't have to do anything about it and admin intervention should only be saved for filter bypass.

 

 I would also like to point out whilst the ban claims i've had four seperate warnings for what is implied to be greif the fact you banned me without confronting me and the fact that i was told not of the other three times nor warned this dirrectly goes against what im being told about the apparent " warnings " , the way it is presented implys i've been warned four times for " greifing " and nothing else.

 

 

" with ignorant children such as yourself "
and
"  compared to ones that call us names and insult us and call us "unprofessional"

Contridict themselfs highly, before trying to enforce rules such ' don't throw names ' you shouldn't go around calling everyone ' children ' , i am aware that a majority of minecraft's userbase and such your own are however i don't think someone who is most likely barely classed as a none minor should be going around calling names such as that.

 

An admins job even if the job is telling a child why they can't be pardoned is to stick to the basic facts and leave them to think about it , it isn't to make an enemy out of them and throw around insults making things personal.

 

" Warnings go up every time you are temp banned, if I banned you or temp banned you, there increase by one."

My problem with this statement is that this is never explained or shown in rules or anywhere ele.

 

" The server may censor the words, but our Discord Integration does not. " 

This defeats the point of having the censoring in the first place and whatever channel is used for chatlogs should be hidden to admins only to resolve this problem.

 

"Bruh. It's common sense not to do that...In fact, it's pretty much a given."

I stand by my statement, no where in the rules does it say i am not allowed to bypass area restrictions using a tardis and sadly if your server is made up of children being banned all the time as you claim it is you know they have very little common sense so i believe that should be pardoned as not be baised.

 

 

 

 

 

1. If the rules don't explain your banning system then that's a major issue that needs tobe adresed because that's just stupid.

 

2. This still isn't within the rules and so i will still fight against it.

 

3. there's no point in having a filter if your going to add discord intergration.

 

I never claimed the rules needed to have everything in them i just stated i'd broken none since there's no rule against area restriction bypass even if it is common sense as the rules never state " and anything thats common sense ".

Hey everybody it's your favourite former staff member, Mew here!

(Ik unless I'm involved with the ban I shouldn't be replying but eh, felt the need)

1. Yes, the banning system is not included in the rules, but that's because maybe, DMU staff members hope people won't have to be banned, and would actually stick to them, besides, if you've already been temp banned a few times, you should have figured out how it works by now.

 

2. Hmmm, let's see, "restricted area", let's go in it! No. It's restricted for a reason, there doesn't need to be a rule stating not to go in there, wanna know why?

restricted
/r??str?kt?d/
adjective
  1. limited in extent, number, scope, or action.

I presume you would have learnt the meaning, considering restricted generally means limited access, do you think you should be allowed in, if i say, "Do not enter my building while it's in construction" and while I'm away you enter, that's disobeying the given statement, and considering staff gave that, it's a clearly bannable offense, and again, as Josia and Sub said before me, down to common sense.

 

3. I don't think you fully understand, you see, Discord is for users of the age 13 and up, meaning we don't filter swears there because people using it should be above 13, if not, it's their parents fault, or themselves for not understanding that, so swears are not filtered on Discord. MINECRAFT on the other hand has a younger audience of what I believe is 3+ or 7+ or whatever the Java age rating is. Swears are filtered there as there is always a chance a user is udner 13, and since DMU accepts people of all ages we need a filter. A filter means you swore, but younger ones don't have to see it, staff will have known you swore, and will ask you to stop, if you keep swearing with people knowing, that's punishable. It may not be in the rules, but if you were a 9 year old constantly seeing "****" and people asking the person saying "****" to stop. You would wonder what they're saying? Young minds are curious, and we generally don't want them asking their parents what the F word means, and then their parents asking where they learnt this.

 

Again all of this is down to simple common sense, which you should have.
~Mew

It seems you don't even understand the Rules. 

Why would we pardon someone isn't following the rules and been rude with the Admins ?

 

You ruined it, your appeal has been denied.

 

This Thread Shall be locked.

 

This thread has been locked.